So I just reported on a site in Sterling at the headwaters of Rocky Brook where I noticed a few things that might barely be noteworthy:
- small rock piles clustered along the edge of a wetland
- at the headwaters of a brook
- split rocks
- an elongated triangular shaped rock-on-rock
Here was a magnificent split wedged rock:Then after my fall I spotted a rock pile and...away we go. I photo'd this little combination:
Had I not just last night been blogging about "elongated triangles" I would not have noticed that the upper rock in the picture is the same triangular shape. Maybe I am just imaging that this is significant.
Here are two rock piles in the ferns, at the wetland's edge:The near pile had a very interesting and distinct feature (and not something I saw in Sterling). It had a vertical "fin".(Further away)I see these finned rock piles occasionally. I am remembering one I saw at the Conant Land in Carlisle a while ago, also at a wetland's edge.
What a beatiful spot with the piles in the ferns:Most of the piles, unlike these visible ones, were so low and covered with dead leaves that you had to step on them before you noticed them. I started a bit west of the northernmost edge of the wetland but worked my way around to the eastern side, and stopped seeing piles. But I continued southward on the eastern side of that swamp (hey how about a map fragment?)
After not seeing much I did see one quite different type of rock pile: a larger oval mound, completely buried, perhaps ten feet long:A trail and a couple of long boardwalks took me back across to the western side of the swamp, then north and back to my car where (not atypically) the police were waiting to snarl at me about where I parked.
But let's come back to that first cluster of piles on the northwestern extreme of the swamp and some characteristics:
- a wedged rock
- small piles clustered along a wetland's edge
- an elongated triangular shaped rock-on-rock (propped up at an angle)
- a finned pile
So I think we are making some progress towards recognizing certain basic site types. Let me list the ones I can think of and let me work on tidying up the ideas over time - eliminating them, modifying them, so to speak: savoring them. I don't know to what extent these classifications are real or generalizable outside of my Eastern Massachusetts/ Middlesex County sampling territory.
Wetland's Edge Sites - sites with small piles clustered along a water's edge, etc.
Monumental Pile Sites - big rock piles and short stretches of stone wall, mixed with smaller piles; all with a sense of overall site organization and layout.
Cellar Hole Sites - with piles on boulders around a cellar hole and pile-gap-pile features.
Marker Pile Sites - with piles evenly spaced and somewhat in lines. Some piles with vertical sides, etc.
"Burial Pile" Sites - sites with low circular ground piles not in any pattern, having one or two pieces of light rock (usually quartz), with a few piles built on boulders near the edges of the group.
I do not know where effigy rock piles fit into this, they might be mostly a feature of the wetland's edge sites and I failed to see that perspective last weekend. That big oval pile on the western side of the Carlisle swamp was something different again. I have seen things like that in a few other places but they are not part of a more comprehensive feature list; not that I can describe anyway. It seems to me there may be some merit to writing down these feature lists, or at least thinking about them collectively when looking at a site. It makes sense to include topography and other landscape features in the list. There may be some merit to writing down minor observations - since they may turn out to correlate with other sites, but you wouldn't notice, you wouldn't remember where you saw that before. All of which may, in the long run, help to get a sense of the different uses and different cultures that left these rock piles in the woods.
The first photo (that looks like a great big turtle to me) you say is split and wedged, but I can't see where...
ReplyDeleteAlso: Down in Woodbridge, I got kicked out of Sperry's Falls by the water authority police yesterday...
I remember the spot. If someone is not being accosted occasionally by the Police maybe they are not tresspassing enough:)
ReplyDeleteEver since I became interested in the lithic anomalies of the Northeast, I have kept a list of the unusual features I have come across over the ten plus years I've been at this. The first connection I made was between a split connected boulder at the Oley Hills site and a similar boulder in Montville, CT. I described each in a web article I wrote in 1999. "Stone Rows and Boulders." With this similarity, I recognized I was looking at an identical response to split boulders, one that has been repeated over and over as people like Peter and Larry have recorded examples throughout southern New England. It is by making these stylistic connections that we can demonstrate that these unusual manmade features are not restricted to one locale, but are distributed throughout the Northeast and beyond. And maybe, just maybe, archaeologists will begin to pay attention.
ReplyDeleteNorman: I thought one of the most important things you said in that early article was that perhaps the stone rows functioned to connect the boulders or, in the case of split boulders, to connect the separated pieces. My speculation about the meaning of split-wedged rocks is slightly different and I do not think this is the same phenomenon (although it certainly could be).
ReplyDeleteThe comment I made about stone rows connecting with boulders comes directly from Philip Smith and his study of Indian walls in the South. When I saw the same thing happening at the Oley Hills site and later at Montville, I could see that something interesting was going on. Further research has only confirmed this.
ReplyDeleteAs for split boulder fills, I realize there are various ideas on what this signifies. David Whitley in his study of Sally's Rockshelter in California believes that the quartz stones jammed in cracks was meant to propitiate the gods -- a gift -- and not meant to block. I think he is right. It could also be a way of connecting with the underworld spirits, and something apart from a gift.
I think whichever tribe was at Sally's Rockshelter was very different from the Eastern Algonquian. I have see 0 examples of quartz in split-wedged rocks, and am informed by Doug Harris that quartz does not have its own properties so much as passing along the properties of other things. So if a cracked rock is leading into the underworld it would be a very weird act indeed to amplify the crack with quartz. Personal observation together with Doug's statements suggest that Sally's Rockshelter is not a good model for understanding the thinking in New England.
ReplyDeleteIt is all speculation anyway, but the speculation is internally consistent.
I should add that not only did I never claim that quartz "blocked" but on the contrary, I have emphasized the possibility that it transmits and amplifies.
ReplyDeleteQuartz does have one unusual property, and that is its being piezoelectric: take two smooth quartz stone and rub them together and they'll produce a photon light glow. Indians called quartz "lightning stone," and not simply because it could produce sparks. At a split boulder in Pomfret, VT, a semicirclular ring of stones linking one split half to the other contained one piece of quartz, and it was touching one of the split halves. I viewed this quartz cobble like a electric light plug, with the quartz transmitting power from the other stones to this one boulder. Since filling cracks with stones is so widespread throughout North America, I felt that what Whitley described, supported by ethnographical information from the Indian tribes themselves, could be an answer for the many other examples we find. Maybe it isn't the sole answer, but how do we prove the validity of other hypotheses?
ReplyDeleteAlso, the idea of stones "blocking" comes from the Gage's website. It is not my idea, though it may have some validity in certain instances.
Actually it does not come from their website but from my article on split wedged rocks.
ReplyDelete