It is not important that we agree.
It is important that we talk.
Note the alignment of the glyph on the rock and the sight
hole on the cairn.
I just recently “re-connected”
with Carl, I am happy to say. I even corrected a dead link to his pages at the
Waking Up On Turtle Island blog: Carl Bjork's Rock Art Site
A bit of wisdom, passed on to Carl by a Native American Elder: "The location of the site was selected first and the
rock-art came later. Turn your back to the symbols and you will see why the location
was selected because you are standing at the center of the information depicted
in the carvings and paintings. Watch the
play of light and shadow on the symbols.
It is our history...in a time before we started using your alphabets to
record our history. The symbols and
figures are a pictorial [ideographic] communication system that was used by
most tribal groups and understood by all."
Something else that
comes to mind, mentioned here and there at Rock Piles, is that thing about “the
shape of a stone on a rock pile having the same shape as a mountain or hill in
the distance.” Carl also notes this phenomena sometimes occurs elsewhere, as he
writes, in a section about perceiving possible images and pareidolia: “When we
look at a rock art panel and notice that the top of the boulder is in the same
shape of the mountain behind on the far horizon, is it a coincidence that it is
shaped as the horizon and did the petroglyph carver select the boulder to
record to share a message or a history about the rock art site and its
relationship to the mountain?”
The photo above comes from this page:
For similar piles in MA with holes you can see through: search this blog for "aperture" and (mis-spelled) "aperature".
ReplyDelete