DNA population comparison is BALONEY

 According to my chatbot:

Percent of variable DNA examined

Humans have roughly 3–4 million common variable sites (SNPs and similar variants). Standard population‑genetics datasets examine 300,000 to 1,000,000 of those.

The proportion is:

$$\frac{3\times {10}^5\text{ to }{10}^6}{3\times {10}^6\text{ to }4\times {10}^6}\approx 10\mathrm{\%}\text{ to }30\mathrm{\%}$$

So population‑comparison studies typically use about 10–30% of the variable DNA.

That’s the number.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Got that? Between 1/10 and 1/3 of "important" dna is compared. A vast playground for cherry picking.

Also, do not wait around for them to perform any form of reasonable sampling. I read something about using "30" individuals. Are you kidding me? If a tree has 100 branch points, you will not deduce it from a sample size of 30.