With reference to the sense of permanence offered by rocks, at least in my Anglo culture:
This is about rock piles and stone mound sites in New England. A balance is needed between keeping them secret and making them public. Also arrowheads, stone tools and other surface archaeology.
We walked around in the pine saplings, uphill a bit to the west and saw a boulder with multiple splits. They were all wedged:
[Sorry I did not photo the whole boulder]
I wonder why this rock is filled rather than simply wedged? Is it a different phenomenon?
I know it is a mess but the uneven hollows in the pile have brief moments of well-made siding, in other words, they do look like remnants of holes built into the pile, now collapsed or broken. Now I know you will be saying: those aren't structural, that mess you see is just someone digging into the pile. However, I have been thinking about this type of pile since reporting on a recent find in Harvard (click here).
(Compare with the last photo of the Harvard example above.) And several more rock piles uphill nearby:
This shows two of three not quite in a line but at about the same elevation on the slope. A closeup of one:
There were other rock piles on the slope that I did not pay too much attention to. I wanted to explore more to the south, which I did - taking pictures at the cemetery. But I did not find too much of anything new.
Did I notice at the time that the support rock is also of this same kidney bean shape? Three of these shapes all together must mean something.
And then, how about the "money" shot of a rock pile with Rt 2 in the background.
I have tried to see it as I drive east from Tracy's garage, at the exact height of land. In principle it ought to be visible - one of four interesting things visible from this highway between Lexington and Leominster.
Below, two views of the same rock pile, for two reasons. This is to show the small hole in the top. The construction is deliberate.
Then, this view, 90 degrees from the picture above, the top of the rock pile lines up nicely with both the horizon and the rock pile above it.
This standing stone is one that, in and of itself, I might question whether or not it was placed.
But here is something to consider. Just above this stone, looking downhill you can see another rock pile in the distance so that the two together have an intentional appearance. If you click on this photo, you may see that distant rock pile just over the dead fall branch.
This large rock pile is further uphill, at the flat or plateau that is just below a large outcrop.
A view from the front of the boulder. Notice that, although there are trailing rocks at the back, there are no rocks stacked on top, to the very front of the boulder where it is flat. This would not have been efficient if this was field clearing. There is another rock pile just off to the right from this photo, but too far to fit both piles in one photo.
This stone is pretty thick, so I can't say whether or not it is intentional as a standing stone, however, notice the two rock piles visible just above it in the distance. Visibility from feature to feature seems to be a theme at this site.
This last rock pile is within view of a large outcrop (the outcrop is just off to the left). I looked at this pile from different views and it appears to be nothing more than a "heap of stones" until you look at it from this vantage point. It is pretty when looked at from this direction.
The majority of the site is just behind and to the right of this rock pile.
Not sure what this might have been:
Then, on the other side of the brook, a pair of larger piles:
(from the other side)
Here is a better view of the smaller one:
It shows signs of careful construction but I try to be a little suspicious of the rock piles. Uphill and a bit upstream from these were some other more loosely scattered rocks, possibly from field clearing or possibly a smeared remnant of a destroyed rock pile; it was hard to say. There was quite a lot of that tourmaline granite in there.
(Nice rock in the foreground.)
Then, further down hill, a pair of rock piles:
Here is one:
and a closeup:
And the other pile:
and a closeup:
Both piles had this pale material at the southern side of the pile. This is the same material I mentioned here. It really is used a lot in this part of Stirling.
on closer inspection, comparing what I was carrying to the rock in the pile:
I could see this same special tourmaline granite was used here as well. I could not resist taking some new photos of the place, noticing new details:
(I have been paying closer attention to how things are related to splits in rocks.)
[Notice what looks like a path in this picture, passing the pile and heading toward the lake.]
and popped it back into place:
I know this is not OK but it was the best I could do. A final picture of this beautiful rock, I can tell you that the best surface with the nicest crystal visible was turned uppermost.
This is not a common material but it seems relatively common in this part of Sterling.
Symbolism for me, even if stripped of superstition, is still satisfying. I was glad to return this rock.