This is about rock piles and stone mound sites in New England. A balance is needed between keeping them secret and making them public. Also arrowheads, stone tools and other surface archaeology.
There are only so many ways one can flake stone. It is not surprising that groups should have hit upon similar methods. I once found a tool at a Massachusetts site that strongly resembled an Oldowan tool - but this did not lead me to conclude that Australopithecines were present! The same applies to the conjecture that outre-pas flaking such as is found on Paleo-Indian tools and Solutrean tools in Spain and France necessarily imply a transatlantic relationship between the two cultures.
Yes true, but the technology sophistication compared to oldowan is significant. Mutual parallel development get's harder to justify when the technology is so complex.
There are only so many ways one can flake stone. It is not surprising that groups should have hit upon similar methods. I once found a tool at a Massachusetts site that strongly resembled an Oldowan tool - but this did not lead me to conclude that Australopithecines were present! The same applies to the conjecture that outre-pas flaking such as is found on Paleo-Indian tools and Solutrean tools in Spain and France necessarily imply a transatlantic relationship between the two cultures.
ReplyDeleteYes true, but the technology sophistication compared to oldowan is significant. Mutual parallel development get's harder to justify when the technology is so complex.
ReplyDelete