Prayers In Stone Project
Native Sites Stewardship Program
Founded
2024 Sagamore Strong Bear Medicine & D.V.Boudillion
How do you know?
26 July 2024 Daniel V.
Boudillion
Several years ago I was at a Friends of Pine Hawk lecture on Native stone
structures by two recognized experts in the field. At one point while they were interpreting a
type of stone structure, an audience member asked “But how do you know
that?” Much to the dismay of all there
that night, they were unable to answer this question.
This awkward situation left an
impression on me. It’s a question I
often ask myself as I walk the woods and assess stonework as Native: “Yes, but
how I know?”
This essay is not to answer this
question, but to provide an illustration of people creating structures in the
woods that resemble Native type structures, but are not. It’s a cautious call to caution.
On the recent Prayers in Stone
survey of the local forestry property, I noticed some trees had been cut next
to the forestry barn, and the wood left stacked there.
I was intrigued because the wood
was piled in a way – that were it stone and not wood – would likely have
elicited a Native ceremonial origin assessment from me.
It illustrates that people pile
things, often in the woods, in a manner that closely resembles the structures
that we typically assess as Native-origin, ceremonial in nature. If modern people can pile wood in a way that
exactly resembles – were it in stone – constructions we would call Native, they
can also pile stone as well in ways that look Native but are not.
Which beings me back to the
question: How do we know?
Please see below pictures of the
“ceremonial” wood stacking.
Log pile 1 Log pile 2
Stick pile All three piles in view
At the forestry barn large cut
logs are stacked in a deliberately constructed pile on a boulder, much like
these large rocks stacked on a boulder at Trails Through Time.
These smaller “donation” sticks
have been placed in a split rock at forestry barn. This is much like the picture to the right of
small donation stones placed in a large split rock.
Here we have two large log lengths
perched on a boulder in classic “rock-on-rock” style, as exemplified by the
picture to the right.
The picture to the
left is of all three log pile constructions.
It has everything we look for: a variety of recognized styles, they are
in a cluster, and the cluster is within an enclosure of stone rows. Were this stone on stone, not wood on stone,
we would assess it as Native.
But its not Native. This is the point, its not Native. People pile things on boulders for
a variety of reasons. This is a perfect
example. Keep this in mind the next time
you are working on assessments.
Be
cautious.
Like the fellow said: “How do you know?”