I went back to explore around the fringes of the site I found a few weeks ago [click here]. I wanted to explore more across the street (where I saw that stone niche) but before that, I noticed a couple of extra ridges extending into the low wetlands on the same side of the road and adjacent to the original site so I decided to explore there first.
Recall that the unusual feature at the earlier site was "mound with hollow" that was triangular and, so, a bit different from all the other examples of mounds with hollows that I have been looking at. The hollow was not all that clear - as much something I wanted to see as it was real. So I am poking down towards the lowland's edge and see a rock pile that, upon inspection, seemed to be crescent shaped:And:And:This is unfamiliar - a crescent shaped rock pile - perhaps 3 feet high, 20 feet long.
To my surprise, I found another, slightly smaller, a few yards away:
And:Near these, as I poked around within an area no more than 50 feet across, I saw a couple of other piles. Perhaps more could be seen without the snow:Another:Let's remember that a triangular "mound with hollow" is pretty unusual (actually, unique in my experience). With these other unfamiliar geometric shapes (crescents) occurring no more than -say- 70 yards from the first site, I wonder if this is not something new. Certainly it seems a bit "Wachusetts Tradition"-ey but still quite unique. Searching this blog for the word "crescent" (click here and scroll down) brings up a large crescent shaped pile Norman reported, and a couple of very scrappy things from Boylston. So what gives? Is this new?