Found via reverse link searching [Click here]
Update: I guess what is most interesting to me is that the writers of the article went online to find out about rock piles, so naturally they ended up here because this blog gets good Google placement. In today's world the Internet is the authority. So why is the contrary view, that rock piles are of no significance, not as well represented online? Obviously negative statements do not have the same depth of "link-ability". Unlike the notion that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" you can say, with respect to the Internet, that absence of negative views is de facto evidence the positive views must be correct. So all those doubters out there need to get busy promoting the non-importance of rock piles before it is too late that the public comes to believe our lies:)
Update II: Another point is that negative views about rock piles do not consider the physical evidence of the sites. Until they do, those views are not strong ideas.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment