data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30923/3092354b4fa2809b49879519fe12904803ad6cf8" alt=""
It does not form an enclosure. It's one of those features, though, that I'm not certain about. It's probably just a field clearing wall built near the top of the Kittatinny for some reason, but the section below bears looking at.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f5f8/4f5f8b9bd97357999bf37d39ded65df37481d09c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/039f9/039f913bce25c524e867da7ac2c108b64f9265ad" alt=""
This is about rock piles and stone mound sites in New England. A balance is needed between keeping them secret and making them public. Also arrowheads, stone tools and other surface archaeology.
3 comments :
I find it hard to believe such an elaborate structure would have been for field clearing. A loose pile of rubble would have been a lot easier and have done the same job. Also, I don't know about Penn. fields but that looks like broken rocks, not field rocks. Further, carefully graded/sorted rocks (mostly good sized chunks) do not represent a random sample of sizes which would be the case for field clearing.
I see what you mean.
I haven't completely gotten over the fact that this existed within a mile or two of where I grew up and bonded with the land. I may have climbed around on this wall as a child. Yet I would have sworn that the area where I grew up had no old stone structures. If you don't have eyes to see it, this stuff just isn't there.
Yeah there is a lot of stuff hiding camouflaged as "stone wall" which people automatically ignore.
Post a Comment