Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Speaking of "Petroforms"

Should these count?
Sudbury State Forest
Franklin State Forest 

5 comments :

Norman said...

Petroforms? Perhaps, but I'd like to see them less oovered with pine needles. The bottom one looks more convincing than the first, since the large boulder looks reptilian.

Tim MacSweeney said...

Funny you should ask that.
I'm inclined to say, "Yes."

pwax said...

I should have said: "here are short walls ending in large rocks which could be deliberate effigies."
I am more convinced of the first one, a very short wall and large rock, isolated in the middle of a sapling forest. Versus the second one which is part of a more complex structure behind it. Tim's example in the next post is a pretty good one but where does the rest of that wall go?

Tim MacSweeney said...

"That wall don't go nowhere; I'll bet it's been there hundreds, maybe thousands of years," is the Andy Griffith Joke version. The rows of stones connect to other rows of stones up on the terraces above Cranberry Pond and the huge Cranberry bog that surrounds that. I'll email you a map and all...

Tim MacSweeney said...

That second photo: the boulder has two grooves in the top, much like this one:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZgBTeqibcsw/VQxIhkw4I_I/AAAAAAAASH8/nFarlpDTm3A/s1600/toot%2Btoo%2B2%2B003.JPG
Maybe for some antlers (horns)?
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-b1IyPSkCxV4/VQxIulNZSXI/AAAAAAAASIE/xTXOtbA-siY/s1600/toot%2Btoo%2B2%2B003%2Bwith%2Bhorns%2B(1).jpg