Attached are two photos of a stone mound with tail that I found and photographed in Rochester, VT, two weeks ago.

This is about rock piles and stone mound sites in New England. A balance is needed between keeping them secret and making them public. Also arrowheads, stone tools and other surface archaeology.
But this time I had a careful look around, recalling that there were also some smaller piles nearby. As I was saying, it is these small outliers that cinch the deal for me.
Taking, therefore, a closer look at the main pile we see what is actually a very typical (and now familiar) design:
On the left is a rectangular structure with a depression in the middle. Then the pile has a lower wall-like extension curving around and ending to the right of the tree. This "tail" encloses another rectangular space.
No one has seen this in a while:
Rather like a number of little "marker pile" clusters, or else little water ceremonies with gap piles.
Hundreds of little piles in there:
And moose poopies!
And violets:
And lady slippers coming up next:
Love this stuff:
Attached are some images of a field of cairns that I came across last Sunday in an area near the North end of Lake Oscawana in Putnam County, NY.
There are about eight cairns or rock piles in an 80 x 60m area which is enclosed by prominent stone walls. The cairns vary greatly in size and quality of construction yet each is found on the top of a boulder or rock outcrop.Another unusual feature of this "field" was the lack of thick undergrowth which covered much of the surrounding terrain.
Please let me know if you have any questions.



From on top:
Pile #3:
Piles #4 and #5:
Please note the small structure in the foreground. As much as anything else, small details like this are key to seeing this as a ceremonial site.
This one is pretty much smeared away. One suspect worse than vandals; perhaps it was formally excavated in the past?
Note that bit of wall coming out and turning a corner to the right in the foreground. Another "tail". As I look at these, I am increasingly convinced that the "tail" represents what is left of the wall of an open structure, perhaps roofed at one time with some now decomposed material, that was connected to the mound and part of its design.
So I had to go downhill through the downed trees to find out. Saw two more mounds down there and found that, indeed, the wall does stop after a while. So the site layout is something like this, with a run-off gully starting at the first mound, constrained a bit by the wall, and passing between two other mounds around where the wall ends, something like this:
Here is the run-off gully passing between the two mounds, with the end of the wall to the right:
It is interesting that the wall is nicely squared off at this lower end. I have little doubt this is ceremonial and, as such, it dispels the idea the somehow Indians did not terminate walls in a tidy fashion. So I am getting over the misconception that tidy wall end means the wall was built by anglos.
Gosh this place needs to be cleaned up. I made a comment to the Leominster Fire Department warden (Paul Kennedy) about how the whole place needs a good fire, realizing later he might worry I am an arson. I am not but these woods are a mess and the Leominster Fire Department should do some controlled burns.
(A wetland is to the right in this picture)
A familiar shape. I find it is worth looking at the shapes of single rocks on rocks.
Frank Karkota showed me another interesting site along Snake Meadow Brook, including propped boulders (shown earlier) , some noticeable structures:
and a few hints of rock piles:
But the most interesting feature, for me, was a berm of smaller cobbles:
Walls at either end, join this slightly curved berm to larger boulders:
The result is that the berm encloses a space right next to and opening towards the brook with a view to the east. One more look: